lexinter.net                                                                                                                        

 

LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AND PENALTIES

DEFINITION OF CONTRACT | PROMISE PROMISOR PROMISEE | REQUIREMENT OF A BARGAIN | EFFECT OF MISUNDERSTANDING | INTENTION TO BE LEGALLY BOUND | DEFINITION OF OFFER | PRELIMINARY NEGOTIATIONS | FORM OF ACCEPTANCE INVITED | INVITATION OF PROMISE OR PERFORMANCE | CERTAINTY | CERTAINTY AND CHOICE OF TERMS | TERMINATION OF POWER OF ACCEPTANCE UNDER OPTION CONTRACT | COUNTER OFFERS | LAPSE OF TIME | REVOCATION | OPTION CONTRACT | ACCEPTANCE | PERFORMANCE BY OFFEREE | EXCHANGE | PERFORMANCE OF LEGAL DUTY | CONSIDERATION | MODIFICATION OF EXECUTORY CONTRACT | PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL | CONTRACT NOT TO BE PERFORMED WITHIN A YEAR | PERFORMANCE BY VIRTUE OF ACTION IN RELIANCE | THREAT AND DURESS BY THREAT | INTERPRETATION | DUTY OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING | UNCONSCIONABLE CONTRACT OR TERM | INTEGRATED AGREEMENTS | STANDARDIZED AGREEMENTS | EVIDENCE OF PRIOR OR CONTEMPORANEOUS AGREEMENTS OR NEGOTIATIONS | USAGES | CONDITIONS | EFFECT ON OTHER PARTY'S DUTIES OF FAILURE TO RENDER PERFORMANCE | REMEDIES | DAMAGES | UNFAIRNESS | RESTITUTION

LEGAL DICTIONARY


RECHERCHE INTERNATIONALE ] Remonter ]

RECHERCHE        

--

 

 L'ATLAS

UNION EUROPENNE

EUROPE CENTRALE

RUSSIE

EUROPE DU NORD

AMERIQUE DU NORD

AMERIQUE DU SUD

MEDITERRANEE

AFRIQUE

ASIE

MOYEN ORIENT

  

DROIT FRANCAIS

 DROIT EUROPEEN

 DROIT USA

Accueil LexInter.net

 

RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS  DAMAGES


v. CLAUSE PENALE


THE RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS

copyright by the American Law Institute (1981)

 

 

§356. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AND PENALTIES

(1) Damages for breach by either party may be liquidated in the agreement but only at an amount that is reasonable in the light of the anticipated or actual loss caused by the breach and the difficulties of proof or loss. A term fixing unreasonably large liquidated damages is unenforceable on grounds of public policy as a penalty.

Comments....

b. Test of penalty.....A determination whether the amount fixed is a penalty turns on a combination of these two factors. If the difficulty of proof of loss is great, considerable latitude is allowed in the approximation of anticipated or actual harm. If, on the other hand, the difficulty of proof of loss is slight, less latitude is allowed in that approximation..

c. Disguised penalties.....Neither the parties’ actual intention as to its validity nor their characterization of the term as one for liquidated damages or a penalty is significant in determining whether the term is valid.

d. Related types of provisions....A term that fixes as damages an amount that is unreasonably small does not come within the rule stated in this Section, but a court may refuse to enforce it as unconscionable under...§208.....

 
V° CLAUSE PENALE

 

 

--