The power of the lawyer is a new answer to the law. Set by Jemmy Bentham who left under the common law of the legal system. However, extending this code is also playable to the civil law legal system. But there are fundamental differences between common law and civil law. In the origins, in the development, and in their contemporary ability. So what are these differences and how do they originate?

Civil law is sometimes reflectance law. A percentage is a traditional verdict that has been established in the previous case. Thus this is how judges in the common law legal system influence the development of the respected law. So in civil law codified statute forms the basis of the law percentage from the basis.

Role of Judges and Lawyers

There is a difference in the demand of the way a judge and the lawyer have in the civil law system and in a common law system. In specific thought of law in the civil law system, judges are bound to the written law. Innocent there are relegated to a comparatively minor role. A judge in the civil law system as an investigator. He initiates proceedings for bringing charges. He listens and establishes facts through witness statements and he applies for a legal course in order to wrap up the case. These judges do not create or not form laws. They apply laws created in formulated by others according to proceeds that the judges have taken it. And lawyers in a civil law system represent the interest of the client but their role is much less than that would be a common law system. Their function is with common law, lawyers thus overlap where it comes to advising their client and with preparing legal pleadings for filing with codes. The distinction between common law lawyers and civil law lawyers becomes evident when you look at the importance of presentation or argumentation and having to convince the jury. All these elements are central to a common law legal system.